Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 81426 (KAR)

T MUNIYAPPA v. SMT S SWATHI (ANIKA)

WP/27615/2023 · 2025-07-23

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28079 WP No. 27615 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 27615 OF 2023 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: SRI. T. MUNIYAPPA S/O THIPPESWAMY, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/AT 6/1, M R LANE, 1ST CROSS, COTTONPET, BANGALORE 560053 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. S.G. PARTHASARATHY, ADVOCATE) (ABSENT) AND: SMT. S. SWATHI (ANIKA) W/O LATE M ROSHAN, D/O VENKATEWSHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT NO.79/A, 3RD CROSS, 3RD MAIN, NEAR ABBAIH NAIDU STUDIO, BANGALORE 560053 …RESPONDENT THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 6.11.23 VIDE ANNEXURE-A PASSED IN CRL.MIS.NO.301/2022 ON THE FILE OF FIRST ADDL.PRL.JUDGE FAMILY COURT, BANGALORE BY APPLICATION FILED IS DISMISSED THE I.A.NO. 4 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT HEREIN UNDER SECTION 311 SEEKING PERMISSION TO CROSS EXAMINE THE PW1 OF CR.P.C. AND CONSEQUENTLY BY ALLOWING THE PETITION AND ALSO TO PASS SUCH OTHER ORDERS. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28079 WP No. 27615 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER The present petition is filed in the year 2023 questioning the order dated 06.11.2023 passed in Crl.Misc.No.301/2022 on the file of the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Bangalore. Right from 2023, the matter is pending at the scrutiny stage and the office objections are not complied with. Hence the matter was directed to be listed before the Court on 22.07.2023. On that day, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption 'dismissal' for today. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE KA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30