SARBJEET KAUR v. THE CHIEF ENGINEER PWD BR AND OTHERS
CWP/38675/2025 · 2026-07-20
Jagmohan Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8142 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8142 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** 131
CWP-38675-2025 Date of Decision: 20.07.2026
SARBJEET KAUR …Petitioner Versus
THE CHIEF ENGINEER PWD (B&R) & OTHERS …Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present:- Mr. Dinesh Ghai, Advocate with
Ms. Amita Arora, Advocate,
Mr. Karamjit Singh and
Mr. Harpreet Singh, Advocate for petitioner
Mr. Puru Jarewal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab
***
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
1.
The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent Nos. 1 to 4 to immediately release compensation along with interest with respect to acquisition of her land.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent is utilizing petitioner’s 1 Kanal 15 Marlas land situated in Village Jhunghian, Hadbast 285, Tehsil Nawanshahar, District Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar without acquisition. The respondent is liable to pay compensation as per
order dated 19.01.2017 passed by this Court in CWP-6275-2015. The SUDEEPAK KUMAR 2026.07.20 18:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
-2-
respondent as per jamabandi has taken possession of petitioner’s more than 1 Kanal land.
3.
Learned State counsel submits that as per record, land was acquired in 1969. The respondent has carried out survey and found that as per site plan, petitioner’s 0 Kanal 0 Marla 2.4 Srs. land has been used by PWD. The averment of petitioner that respondent is using her 1 Kanal 15 Marla land is incorrect.
4.
The afore-stated submissions disclose that disputed questions are involved and this Court cannot ascertain whether respondent is using petitioner’s land without acquisitioned or not. This Court can ask respondent to make payment if it is established that there is utilization of land without acquisition.
5.
Disposed of.
6.
Pending Misc. application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL)
JUDGE 20.07.2026 SDK
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
SUDEEPAK KUMAR 2026.07.20 18:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document