POONAM v. UNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS
CWP/20428/2025 · 2025-07-21
Kuldeep Tiwari, To Be Nominated
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 81416 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 81416 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 135 CWP-20428-2025 Date of Decision : July 21, 2025 POONAM -PETITIONER V/S UNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS -RESPONDENTS
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. Jasbir Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjiv Ghai, Advocate for the respondents- M.C. Chandigarh. *** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, J. (ORAL)
1. The orders under challenge in the present writ petition are appealable under the statute. The alternative remedy so provided has not been availed. The primary reason for filing of the present writ petition, without availing the alternative remedy, is that the limitation for filing of appeal has expired.
2. Since various factual issues are also raised in the matter, this Court deems it appropriate to relegate the petitioner to the remedy of appeal. The writ petition in such circumstances is not entertained and is dismissed.
DEVINDER YADAV 2025.07.22 15:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment
CWP-20428-2025 2
3. It is however provided that if appeal is filed within two weeks from today, the same shall be entertained on merits.
(ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA) JUDGE
(KULDEEP TIWARI) July 21, 2025
JUDGE devinder Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No DEVINDER YADAV 2025.07.22 15:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment