Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8141 (KAR)

M/S PARAS AGENCIES v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/107472/2024 · 2025-01-30

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:1879 WP No. 107472 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 107472 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: M/S PARAS AGENCIES REP BY ITS PARTNER- ROSHAN N. DOSHI, AGE. 45 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, SHOP/AT. TABIB LAND, 1ST FLOOR, SHREE GOURI SADAN, NEAR KEB OFFICE, HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD, KARNATAKA -580020. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GOURI SHANKAR MOT, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPT. OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYATH RAJ, VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE -560001. 2. THE PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, GRAM PANCHAYAT AMMANALLURU, TQ. KOLAR, DIST. KOLAR -563128. 3. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUK PANCHAYAT, BRINDAVAN CIRCLE, GAURIPETH, KOLAR -563101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SHARAD V. MAGADUM, AGA FOR R1, NOTICE TO R2 & R3 ARE SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IS PRAYING TO, ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE REPLY GIVEN BY THE Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:1879 WP No. 107472 of 2024 RESPONDENT NO.2 VIDE ANNEXURE-G ON DATED. 29/10/2024. ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS BY DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO. 2 AND 3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED. 25/10/2024, I.E., ANNEXURE-C AND D DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO. 2 TO PAY THE PETITIONER AS UM OF RS. 56,949/- WITH INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 12% PER ANNUM AS RAISED VIDE BILL NO. GEN1031 (ANNEXURE-B). THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the petition and the grievances of the petitioner has been redressed. In the light of the memo so filed, the petition stand disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE RHR/- List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22