Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:128914 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10910 of 2025 Petitioner :- Har Deep Singh Respondent :- State of U.P. and 3 others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jitendra Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The grievance of the writ petitioner appears to be as regards non-payment of retiral dues and leave encashment.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents points out that in the entire writ petition, the claim of the petitioner has not been spelt-out nor is there any application annexed to the petition, by which it can be inferred that petitioner ever agitated his claim for alleged retiral dues before Competent Authority.
4. Considering the material placed before this Court, the writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:- (i). The petitioner is permitted to move a specific application disclosing his claim for retiral dues within a period of three weeks from today before the Competent Authority; (ii). The Authority shall take up the matter and dispose of the application strictly in accordance with law within a period of next three months; (iii). As soon as the application is disposed of, a copy of the decision shall be served upon the petitioner by registered
post without any delay. Order Date :- 1.8.2025 Jyotsana Digitally signed by :- JYOTSANA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad