IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82210 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-62 Year-2020 Thana- PAHARPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== Ajit Kumar S/O Ramayan Ram R/O Village- Kamalpipra, P.S- Paharpur, Distt.- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pawan Kumar Chaurasia, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 24-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 379, 302 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per F.I.R., it is alleged that his petitioner, along with other accused persons named in the F.I.R., in order to grab the land of the informant, which was purchased by his father, brutally assaulted informant and his family members by means of lathi, danda and farsa. It is further alleged that co-accused Ranjit Ram assauted father of informant by means of farsa and thereafter co-accused Duggi Ram strangulated father of informant due to which he died. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82210 of 2024(2) dt.24-01-2025 2/3 4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. As a matter of fact, due to admitted land dispute between the parties, on the alleged date and time of occurrence, maar-peet took place between them. Specific accusation of assault is against other co-accused persons. So far as this petitioner is concerned, he is only alleged to be member of the mob and there is no specific accusation of overt act against this petitioner. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedents and he is in custody since 27.08.2024. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, nature of accusation, period of custody and clean antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant bail of to the petitioner is allowed. 7. Accordingly, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Sessions Jduge- 14, East Champaran at Motihari, in connection with Paharpur Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82210 of 2024(2) dt.24-01-2025 3/3 P.S. Case No. 62 of 2020. shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T