- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46622 WP No. 57093 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K WRIT PETITION NO. 57093 OF 2016 BETWEEN: A. NARASIMHA IYENGAR S/O LATE. ALWAR IYENGAR, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, NOW TEMPORARILY R/AT: NO.G201, 7TH MAIN, OPPOSITE-HAL HOSPITAL, OLD TOWNSHIP COLONY, BENGALURU-560017. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. A. NARASIMHAR IYENGAR., ADVOCATE (ABSENT) ) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001. 2. THE TAHASILDAR OFFICE OF THE TAHSILDAR, MALUR, MALUR TALUK-563130. Digitally signed by DHARMALINGAM Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46622 WP No. 57093 of 2016 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KOLAR DISTRICT, KOLAR-563101. 4. R. SHIVANANDAPPA S/O LATE RAMAIAH SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 5. R. CHINNAPPA SHETTY S/O LATE RAMAIAH SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, RESPONDENTS NO.4 & 5 ARE R AT: MASTI VILLAGE, MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. NEELAKANTAPPA K.PUJAR., HCGP FOR R1 TO R3 (PH) SRI. NARENDRA D.V.GOWDA., ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN APPEAL NO.761/2003 DATED 16.04.2015 AT ANNEXURE-H AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO RE-GRANT THE LAND IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46622 WP No. 57093 of 2016 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL ORDER In view of the death of the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Court had issued court notice to the petitioner. The office note reveals that the notice was unserved for the reason that "the petitioner left the address". 2. The case is called out. The petitioner remained absent. 3. In such circumstances, it could be presumed that the petitioner is not interested to pursue this writ petition and there is no reason to keep this writ petition pending further. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE DL CT:JL