Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:131739 Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 11076 of 2025 Petitioner :- Pushpa Respondent :- State Of U.P And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sr. Advocate,Vinayak Varma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shiv Raj Singh,Shrinath Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Shiv Raj Singh, learned counsel for respondent no. 2 and Mr. Shrinath, learned counsel for respondent nos. 3, 4 and 5 and perused the record. 2. At the very outset, Mr. Shiv Raj Singh, learned counsel for respondent no. 2 informs this Court that his name is not shown in the cause list. Office is directed to correct the same in the next cause list. 3. The instant petition has been filed challenging the order, dated 17.07.2025, passed by District Basic Education Officer, Bhadohi, vide which the petitioner has been placed under suspension. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on the basis of several complaints, the petitioner has been placed under suspension on vague and ambiguous charges. He submits that the petitioner has given reply to the notice, dated 17.03.2025, which has also not been considered. He further submits that the allegations leveled upon the petitioner that she was absent on 06.03.2024 is also not correct as she was present on the said date. He next submits that though in the allegations some earlier conduct of the petitioner has been mentioned, but there is no adverse entry against the petitioner as well as that without giving any opportunity of hearing, to the petitioner, the impugned order has been passed. 5. Learned counsel for respondent, Basic Education Officer, submits that there is no illegality and infirmity in the impugned suspension order and after giving notice as well as considering the concerned reply, the order impugned has been passed. The authorities concerned have also proceeded to conduct a preliminary inquiry finding that the allegations against the petitioner were found to be correct, however, final inquiry shall be conducted within a stipulated period, as directed by this Court. 6. Taking note of the aforesaid submissions as well as after perusal of the impugned order no interference is called for by this Court, however, it is observed that the final inquiry pending against the petitioner shall be concluded as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of one month, from the date of production of certified copy of this order, subject to cooperation of the petitioner, in accordance with law, if there is no other legal impediment. 7. With aforesaid observations, this petition finally stands disposed of. Order Date :- 5.8.2025 Saurabh Digitally signed by :- SAURABH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad