Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 210
Mohan Lal
Sh. Ajit Bala Ji Joshi, Development Authority, now Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran, Sec.-6, Panchkula and another
CORAM:
Present:-
NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)
proceedings the interim ordinate Bench of this Court in titled as “ vs. Mohan Lal”, in which the following order was passed as follows :
Devendra Sharma, HCS, Estat COCP-2722-2023 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.2722 of 2023
Date of decision : Mohan Lal Versus Sh. Ajit Bala Ji Joshi, IAS, Chief Administrator, Haryana Urban Development Authority, now Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran, 6, Panchkula and another
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Mr. Naveen, Advocate for
Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Arvind Seth, Advocate for the respondents.
NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that proceedings be initiated against the respondent interim order dated 29.5.2023 (Annexure P ordinate Bench of this Court in CM-5662 titled as “Haryana Urban Development Authority, Karnal and another vs. Mohan Lal”, in which the following order was passed as follows :
“Learned counsel for the submits that the appellants will allow the execution of sale deed/transfer deed qua the property as per their policy.
The application stands disposed of.” Short reply dated 31.8.2024 by way of affidavit of Shri Devendra Sharma, HCS, Estate Officer, HSVP, Karnal has already
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2722 of 2023 (O & M) Date of decision :-02.09.2025 …..Petitioner IAS, Chief Administrator, Haryana Urban Development Authority, now Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran, …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate Mr. Arvind Seth, Advocate for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that contempt against the respondent(s) for not complying Annexure P-1) passed by a co- 5662-2023 in RSA-834-2020 Haryana Urban Development Authority, Karnal and another vs. Mohan Lal”, in which the following order was passed as follows :-
“Learned counsel for the non-applicants submits that the appellants will allow the execution of sale deed/transfer deed qua the property as per their policy. The application stands disposed of.” Short reply dated 31.8.2024 by way of affidavit of Shri e Officer, HSVP, Karnal has already VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.03 20.46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
been filed in the Registry enclosing the documents Annexures R R-3, which have been annexed on the file. The same are taken on record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner(. Registry to ta book.
submits that since the compliance has been made, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of as such.
necessary compliance has been made; thus, no cause survives in the present petition.
as having been rendered infructuous.
September 0 Vijay Asija
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
COCP-2722-2023 (O & M) been filed in the Registry enclosing the documents Annexures R 3, which have been annexed on the file. The same are taken on record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner(. Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper
Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that since the compliance has been made, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of as
Learned counsel for the respondent necessary compliance has been made; thus, no cause survives in the present petition. In view of the above, the present petition is as having been rendered infructuous. Rule stands discharged.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. September 02, 2025
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
2 been filed in the Registry enclosing the documents Annexures R-1 to 3, which have been annexed on the file. The same are taken on record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner(. g/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper-
Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that since the compliance has been made, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of as
Learned counsel for the respondents also submits that necessary compliance has been made; thus, no cause survives in the In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.03 20.46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document