DILBAGH SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CWP/20392/2025 · 2025-07-21
Harsimran Singh Sethi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 81344 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 81344 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
129
DILBAGH SINGH AND ANOTHER STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CORAM:
Present:
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral)
1.
petitioner is that Chogawan, Bhindia, Saida, Rania and back route line but there is no time table hence, respondents be directed to approve a joint time table for stage carriage service.
2.
have already raised the said grievance in the copy of which has been appended as Annexure P pending consideration with the respondents and satisfied, at this stage, in case a direction is issued to the respondents to IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDI
CWP-20392
Date of Decision : 21 DILBAGH SINGH AND ANOTHER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
Mr. Ashutosh Mishra, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Saurav Verma, Addl. A.G., Punjab. *** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) In the present petition, the grievance being raised by the ioner is that they are operating the stage Chogawan, Bhindia, Saida, Rania and back route line but there is no time hence, respondents be directed to approve a joint time table for stage carriage service.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners have already raised the said grievance in the copy of which has been appended as Annexure P pending consideration with the respondents and satisfied, at this stage, in case a direction is issued to the respondents to IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 20392-2025 Date of Decision : 21-07-2025 ........Petitioner(s) VERSUS ........Respondent(s) JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Advocate Saurav Verma, Addl. A.G., Punjab.
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) In the present petition, the grievance being raised by the they are operating the stage carriage permit on Amritsar to Chogawan, Bhindia, Saida, Rania and back route line but there is no time hence, respondents be directed to approve a joint time table for stage counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners have already raised the said grievance in the legal notice dated 09.04.2025, copy of which has been appended as Annexure P-12 the but the same is still pending consideration with the respondents and the petitioners will be satisfied, at this stage, in case a direction is issued to the respondents to
........Petitioner(s) ........Respondent(s)
JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI In the present petition, the grievance being raised by the on Amritsar to Chogawan, Bhindia, Saida, Rania and back route line but there is no time hence, respondents be directed to approve a joint time table for stage counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners legal notice dated 09.04.2025, but the same is still he petitioners will be satisfied, at this stage, in case a direction is issued to the respondents to SAPNA GOYAL 2025.07.22 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-20392-2025
-2- decide the same by passing an appropriate speaking order in a time bound manner.
3.
Notice of motion.
4.
On the asking of the Court, Mr. Saurav Verma, Addl. A.G., Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and submits that in case, the legal notice dated 09.04.2025 (Annexure P-2) has been received in the office of the concerned authorities and the same is still pending
consideration with the authorities concerned, the same will be decided by the competent authority within a period of eight weeks from the date of the receipt of certified copy of this order by passing an appropriate speaking
order. Learned counsel further submits that in case, it is found feasible to accept the claim of the petitioners, the same will be accepted, otherwise due reasons will be mentioned for not accepting the claim of the petitioners in the speaking order to be passed and the said order will be duly conveyed to the petitioners.
5.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that keeping in view the statement of learned counsel for the respondent-State, the present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further.
6.
Ordered accordingly.
21-07-2025 Sapna Goyal
(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE
NOTE:
Whether speaking: YES
Whether reportable: NO SAPNA GOYAL 2025.07.22 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document