Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8134 (KAR)

SHRI. ADIVEPPA S/O SOMALINGAPPA BOLANNVAR v. SHRI. MOHAMMED ROSHAN

CCC/100376/2024 · 2025-01-13

Ashok S Kinagi, Ramachandra D Huddar

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:499-DB CCC No. 100376 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 100376 OF 2024 (CIVIL) BETWEEN: SHRI. ADIVEPPA S/O SOMALINGAPPA BOLANNVAR AGE 66 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE AND EX SERVICEMEN, R/O MURAGOD TAL SAUNDATTI, DIST BELAGAVI- 591117 …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. SHIVRAJ S BALLOLI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SHRI. MOHAMMED ROSHAN THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BELAGAVI, DIST BELAGAVI 590001. 2. SMT. PRABHAVATI G. FAKIRPUR THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BAIHONGAL, BAILHONGAL SUB-DIVISION, TAL BAILHONGAL, DIST BELAGAVI- 591102 3. SHRI. MALLIKARJUN HEGGANNAVAR THE TAHASILDAR, SAUDATTI, TAL. SAUDATTI, DIST. BELAGAVI 591126. 4. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT, BENGALURU 560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. …ACCUSED (BY SRI. G.K. HIREGOUDAR, AGA FOR A4 NOTICE TO A2 & A3 ARE SERVED) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT R/W ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950, PLEASED TO EXERCISE ITS JURISDICTION UNDER SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED FOR WILLFULLY DISOBEYING THE ORDER DATED Digitally signed by MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:499-DB CCC No. 100376 of 2024 01/04/2024 PASSED BY THIS HON BLE COURT IN WP NO.100587/2024 AS PER ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI) This contempt petition is arising out of the order passed in W.P.No.100587/2024, wherein the learned Single Judge directed the respondents to consider the representations dated 16.07.2016 and 01.09.2021, as per Annexures-D and E within a period of three months, failing which, the petitioner is at liberty to take necessary steps in that regard. 2. After disposal of the writ petition, petitioner has submitted Form No.7 and the respondents-authorities did not passed any order on Form No.7. Hence, the complainant has filed this contempt petition. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:499-DB CCC No. 100376 of 2024 3. Learned AGA filed memo stating that, immediately after receipt of the order from this court, respondent Nos.1 and 2 have considered the representations of the complainant dated 16.07.2016, 01.09.2021 and gave detailed endorsement dated 01.01.2025 and 02.01.2025. Copies of the endorsements are produced along with the memo, marked as document Nos.1 and 2. 4. It is stated that there is some delay in considering the direction of this Court within the stipulated time. The accused prays to pardon the said delay, as there was no intention to disobey the order of this court and the delay caused is not intentional or willful. The delay is for bonafide administrative reasons. The accused sincerely tender their unconditional apology for the delay and the unconditional apology. 5. The memo is placed on record. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:499-DB CCC No. 100376 of 2024 6. The respondents have complied with the order passed by the learned Single Judge in the aforesaid writ petition and also sought unconditional apology. In view of the same, nothing survives for consideration in this contempt petition. 7. Accordingly, the contempt petition is dropped. The notice is discharged. 8. The complainant is at liberty to challenge the endorsements, if so advised. Sd/- (ASHOK S. KINAGI) JUDGE Sd/- (RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR) JUDGE MBS CT: BSB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10