Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 81338 (KAR)

MOHAMMED GHOUSE PEER v. SMT. HAMEED BANU

WP/26323/2024 · 2025-07-23

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28002 WP No. 26323 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 26323 OF 2024 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: MOHAMMED GHOUSE PEER AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS S/O LATE MOHAMMED HAYATH R/AT JIDDIGERE VILLAGE & POST YADIYURU HOBLI KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 134 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VINAYA KUMAR N.D, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND: SMT. HAMEED BANU W/O MOHAMMED GHOUSE PEER AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT NO.618, GUJJARI MOHALLA, MADDUR ROAD NEAR JANIA MASJID, KUNIGAL TOWN & TALUK TUMAKURU-560 064 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. ABDUL SAB, ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 27.06.2024 IN CRL.RP.NO.03/2024 PASSED BY THE VII ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, TUMAKUR AND ETC. Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28002 WP No. 26323 of 2024 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER This petition is filed on 14.08.2024. From that day to till now, petitioner has not complied with the office objections. 2. When the matter was listed on 22.07.2025, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, this Court had directed the matter to be listed for 'dismissal' on 23.07.2025. 3. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, it appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter. 4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE CR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 66