- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44757 MSA No. 71 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO. 71 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SMT. GOWRAMMA, W/O SIDDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/AT BANADAHALLI VILLAGE, KARAGADA POST, BELUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 115 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SADASHIVAIAH K.G., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER HRP-2 OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, HASSAN DISTRICT, HASSAN - 573 201. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER HASSAN DISTRICT, HASSAN - 573 201. 3. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KAVERI NEERAVARI NIGAMA YAGACHI PROJECT, BELUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 115 …RESPONDENTS THIS MFA FILED U/S 54(1) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 30.07.2024 PASSED IN LAC(A).NO. 160/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, HASSAN. THIS MFA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA Digitally signed by PRASHANTH N V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44757 MSA No. 71 of 2025 ORAL JUDGMENT The appellants have initially filed MFA. Vide order dated 01.04.2025, the appellants were permitted to convert MFA into MSA. Inspite of that, learned counsel for the appellants has not taken any steps to make necessary corrections. Therefore, in the preamble, still it is reflecting as MFA and not MSA. 2. Office has raised several objections. 3. Learned counsel for the appellants prays for time. 4. Order sheet dated 15.10.2025 reads as under: "Learned counsel for the appellant prays for time. Office has raised as many as 8 objections, the same is not complied and the Court fee is not paid, even though the matter is listed for non-compliance of office objections for fifth time. I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter. However, to afford final opportunity, as a last chance, list this matter on 05.11.2025." 5. The matter is listed for fifth time for compliance of office objections. None of the office objections have been complied with and there is no progress in the matter. It - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44757 MSA No. 71 of 2025 appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the matter. 6. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default i.e., for non-prosecution. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE PNV CT:VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7