1 2025:CGHC:7675 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1186 of 2025 1 - Yogeshwar Kumar Sarwa S/o Late Thakur Ram Sarwa Aged About 43 Years Office Of Janpat Panchayat Nawagarh, District- Bemetara ( C.G. ). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Panchayat Directorate Through- The Director, Vikas Bhavan, Sector- 19, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Raipur ( C.G. ). 3 - Deputy Director Panchayat, District- Bemetara (C.G.). 4 - Chief Executive Officer Jila Panchayat, District- Bemetara (C.G.). 5 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Nawagarh, District- Bemetara ( C.G. ). Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 6 - Collector District- Bemetara ( Chhattisgarh ). ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ritesh Verma, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/ State : Ms. Nupur Trivedi, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 13/02/2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10:1. that, the Hon'ble Court may further be pleased to quash the suspension order No./3980/Jila Panchayat/Establishment/2024 Bemetara, dated 3.10.2024 passed by the Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat Bemetara (Ann. P/1) at an earliest. 10:2. that, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue appropriate writ or direction to the respondents to pass an order/direction to the respondents to place the petitioner at his original posting place i.e. Office of Janpad Panchayat Nawagarh, District Bemetara. 10.3. that, the respondents may kindly be directed that they should not penalize the petitioner on the basis of false allegation and they may be directed to compensate the petitioner for his false prosecution. The Hon'ble Court may kindly pass any order or issue any suitable writ or direction as 3 may deem fit under the circumstances of the case.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file an appeal before the competent authority against the order of suspension passed against the petitioner. However, he prays that the competent authorities may be directed to decide the appeal within some stipulated period. 3. No objection has been raised from other side. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the arguments advanced by the petitioner, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file appropriate appeal before the appellate authority, and, in turn, the appellate authority is directed to decide the appeal within a period of three months from the date of filing of the appeal along with this order. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat