RAJKUMAR AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OFUTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS
CRLP/17102/2025 · 2025-09-10
Abdul Shahid, Siddhartha Varma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 81322 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 81322 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 17102 of 2025 Court No. - 43 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
HON'BLE ABDUL SHAHID, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Apurva Hajela, learned counsel appearing for the first-informant and learned AGA for the State.
2. Although, the prayer made in this writ petition is to quash the First Information Report dated 14.7.2025 giving rise to Case Crime No. 0410 of 2025, under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 61(2), 351(2) BNS, Police Station Tappal, district Aligarh, but at the time when the matter is taken up learned counsel for the petitioners confines his relief to grant of protection under section 35 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
3. We have perused the the First Information Report, which prima facie discloses commissioning of cognizable offence and, therefore, the prayer made to quash F.I.R. otherwise cannot be entertained in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of State of Telangana Vs. Habib Abdullah Jellani, (2017) 2 SCC 779 and Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra and Others, (2021) SCC Online SC 315.
4. We are of the view that no interference is warranted.
5. However, considering the fact that all offences mentioned in the present case are punishable with a term up to 7 years, the authorities are directed to ensure the procedure of arrest as per the guidelines of the Supreme Court enshrined in the case of Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273.
6. It is expected of the police not to harass the petitioners till the conclusion of the investigation in any manner whatsoever. However, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : A Kumar Srivastava, Surya Kesh Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : Apurva Hajela, G.A. Rajkumar And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Ofuttar Pradesh And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
the petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation.
7. The writ petition, accordingly, is disposed of. September 11, 2025 sfa/ CRLP No. 17102 of 2025 2 (Abdul Shahid,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- SYED FAHEEM AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SYED FAHEEM AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad