Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:8980 Court No. - 65 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 359 of 2025 Applicant :- Umesh Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Md. Ateef,Mohd. Arshad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
1. List has been revised.
2. Heard Sri Mohd. Arshad, learned counsel for applicant as well as Sri R.P. Patel, learned State Law Officer for State.
3. The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to Case Crime No. 197 of 2024, under Sections 109, 115(2), 352, 351(3) B.N.S., Police Station- Bhatpaarrani, District- Deoria.
4. After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as withdrawn with a direction to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC 825.
5. Learned State Law Officer has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicant.
6. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, no case is made out for interference U/s 482 B.N.S.S. The present anticipatory bail application is
disposed of with a direction that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court below within one month from today and in case a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra).
7. For the period of one month from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the concerned court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant, in the above case.
Order Date :- 20.1.2025 Vikas (Justice Krishan Pahal) Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad