Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 81310 (KAR)

M/S SATWI INFRASTRUCTURES LLP v. SRI K R JAYARAM

WP/25472/2025 · 2025-08-28

M Nagaprasanna

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33590 WP No. 25472 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 25472 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: M/S SATWI INFRASTRUCTURES LLP A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP FIRM, SITE NO.14, GROUND FLOOR, VENKATESHWARA LAYOUT, BBMP WARD NO.25, HORAMAVU, BANGALORE -560 043. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNERS (i) SRI H S RAVI PRAKASH REDDY, S/O H G SONNAPPA REDDY AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS (ii) SRI L NAGARAJU, S/O L S RANGANAYAKULU, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRASANNA KUMAR R.S., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33590 WP No. 25472 of 2025 AND: 1. SRI K R JAYARAM S/O H K RAMAKRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, 2. SMT. NARAYANAMMA D/O K H RAMAKRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO. 1663, SRI MARUTI FARM, NEAR IMPACT COLLEGE, KODIGEHALLI, BANGALORE - 560 092. …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET-ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 23.07.2025 ON IA NO.10, PASSED BY THE HONBLE LXXXVIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, COMMERCIAL COURT (CCH-89) AT BANGALORE IN COMMERCIAL O.S.NO.662/2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33590 WP No. 25472 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the petition and file an appropriate application divulging all the details of production of documents, as the Court rejects the application on the score that the affidavit does not bear any reason. 2. Liberty so sought is granted. 3. The impugned order that is not interfered with. However, the another application is filed. The same shall be considered in accordance with law, without being influenced of the dismissal of the identical application earlier. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE SJK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 69 CT:PS