URBANCLAP TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS
CWP/17211/2024 · 2026-07-17
Sanjay Vashisth, To Be Nominated
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8130 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8130 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ****
CM-13590-CWP-2025; CM-13591-CWP-2026; CM-13592-CWP-2025 in/and CWP-17211-2024 (O&M)
Date of Decision:17.07.2026 URBANCLAP TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ….RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM:- HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present: Mr. Amrinder Singh, Advocate (through video conferencing) for the applicant-petitioner. Mr. Sourabh Goel, Addl., AG, Haryana. ***** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J. (Oral)
1.
CM-13590-CWP-2025 has been filed on behalf of the applicant-petitioner for recalling of judgment dated 12.03.2025 passed by this Court in CWP No.17211 of 2024.
2.
Record reveals that CWP No.17211 of 2024 was disposed of finally vide order dated 12.03.2025 noticing the fact that the issue raised in the writ petition was already engaging attention of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in a batch of petitions.
3.
An application for revival has now been filed stating that subsequent in point of time, a circular has been issued by the State of Haryana which adequately protects the right of the petitioner in the facts of the instant case.
4.
Learned counsel submits that he may be permitted to RAHUL JOSHI 2026.07.20 11:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court, CHD
CWP-17211-2024 (O&M)
2 withdraw the writ petition with liberty to apply for rectification relying upon such circular.
5.
Learned State counsel has no objection to such prayer made by the petitioner.
6.
In that view of the matter, we allow the present application and set aside the judgment dated 12.03.2025 passed in writ petition. The main writ petition is restored to its original number and position.
7.
With the consent of the parties, main writ petition is taken on board for final disposal today itself.
8.
Considering the fact that the writ petition otherwise remained pending, we provide that in the event such an application for rectification is filed within a period of four weeks from today, the same shall be entertained on merits without raising any objection with regard to limitation.
9.
With these observations, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
10.
All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
[ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA] ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE [SANJAY VASHISTH]
JUDGE JULY 17, 2026 Rahul Joshi
1. Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No
2. Whether Reportable Yes/No RAHUL JOSHI 2026.07.20 11:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court, CHD