Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR VANI ON THE 18th OF JANUARY, 2024 SECOND APPEAL No. 2026 of 2023 BETWEEN:- RAMKRIPAL S/O LATE BUDDHU PANIKA, AGED ABOUT 274 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE BHARSDI TEHSIL AND POLICE STATION SARAI DISTRICT SINGRAULI (MADHYA PRADESH) .....APPELLANT (NONE) AND
1.
SHUBHLAL SAHU S/O LAKHPATI, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE BHARSEDI TEHSIL AND POLICE STATION SARAI DISTRICT SINGRAULI (MADHYA PRADESH)
2.
SHIV PRASAD S/O BUDDHU PANIKA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE BARSEDI TEHSIL AND P.S. SARAI DISTRICT (MADHYA PRADESH)
3.
MUNNI W/O INDRAPAL, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE BARSEDI TEHSIL AND P.S. SARAI DISTRICT (MADHYA PRADESH)
4.
AJAY S/O INDRAPAL PANIKA, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE BARSEDI TEHSIL AND P.S.
SARAI DISTRICT (MADHYA PRADESH)
5.
RAMU S/O INDRAPAL PANIKA, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE BARSEDI TEHSIL AND P.S.
SARAI DISTRICT (MADHYA PRADESH)
6.
BABLU S/O INDRAPAL PANIKA, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE BARSEDI TEHSIL AND P.S.
SARAI DISTRICT (MADHYA PRADESH)
7.
VINAY S/O INDRAPAL PANIKA, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE BARSEDI TEHSIL AND P.S.
SARAI DISTRICT (MADHYA PRADESH) 1
(RAJENDRA KUMAR VANI) JUDGE .....RESPONDENTS (NONE) This appeal coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following: ORDER Even in the second round none has appeared for the applicant. It appears that the appellant has lost his interest to prosecute this second appeal. The second appeal is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution. L.R.
2 Digitally signed by LALIT SINGH RANA Date: 2024.01.20 13:22:24 +05'30'