Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 81287 (ALL)

RITU ALIAS RITU MAURYA v. DEVI PRASAD AND 4 OTHERS

A227/8265/2025 · 2025-07-31

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:128870 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 8265 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ritu Alias Ritu Maurya Respondent :- Devi Prasad And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pramod Kumar Vishwakarma Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " Issue an order or direction to the court of Civil Judge (J.D) Shahganj Jaunpur to decide the 6C Application as well as suit No. 288 of 2022 Neetu Vs. Devi prasad within stipulated period." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (6C Application) is pending since 2022 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D) Shahganj Jaunpur to consider and decide the interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 1.8.2025 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad