- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42307 WP No. 16847 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT PETITION NO. 16847 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SURESHAPPA S/O. GUDDAPPA AMBIGERMANE MANE, AGE 68 YEARS. 2. MALATHESHAPPA, S/O. SURESHAPPA AMBIGERMANE MANE, AGED 42 YEARS, R/O. DWARAHALLI VILLAGE, ANAVATTI HOBLI, SORABA TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577413 3. SHIVAJI, S/O. SURESHAPPA AMBIGERMANE MANE, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O. DWARAHALLI VILLAGE, ANAVATTI HOBLI,-577413 SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT. PRESENTLY RESIDENTS OF BILAKI VILLAGE, TALAGUNDA HOBLI, SHIKARIPURA TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT. -577430 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MAHESH R UPPIN, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42307 WP No. 16847 of 2025 AND: 1. SMT MANGALA W/O. ULLAS AMBIGERMANE MANE, AGED 27 YEARS, 2. ABHIJITH, S/O. ULLAS AMBIGERMANE MANE, AGED 7 YEARS, MINOR REPRESENTED BY RESPONDENT NO.1 HIS MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN, RESPONDENTS NO.1 AND 2 ARE RESIDENTS OF MALURU VILLAGE, TALAGUNDA HOBLI, SHIKARIPURA TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-5774390 …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD 03.11.2023 PASSED ON IA NO.I IN OS NO.30/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC SORABA MARKED AS ANNX-E BY ISSUING A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND ORAL ORDER Sri Mahesh R Uppin, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition is filed on the order - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42307 WP No. 16847 of 2025 passed by the trial Court on Interlocutory Application. Learned counsel submits that during pendency of this petition, the dispute in the main suit has been resolved by the parties in the Lok Adalath. In that view of the matter, learned counsel submits that the writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE YKL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3