Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 81244 (ALL)

SANT RAM CHAUDHARY v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/25659/2025 · 2025-08-03

Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:130735-DB Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 25659 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sant Ram Chaudhary Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ravindra Prakash Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- Ashish Agrawal,C.S.C. Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J. 1. Sri Vinay Kumar Pathak, learned counsel has put in appearance on behalf of petitioner which is taken on record. 2 Heard Sri Vinay Kumar Pathak, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner and Ms. Sudha Pandey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.4. 3. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on part of the respondent no.4/Branch Manager, Union of India, Branch Basti-2, District Basti in considering the representation of the petitioners dated July 3, 2025. 3. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent no.4/Branch Manager, Union of India, Branch Basti-2, District Basti should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioners dated July 3, 2025. 4. Accordingly, the respondent no.4/Branch Manager, Union of India, Branch Basti-2, District Basti is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioners dated July 3, 2025 within a period of twelve weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 5. In light of the same, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 4.8.2025 Dev (Prashant Kumar J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.) Digitally signed by :- DEV PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- DEV PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad