- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49005 CRL.P No. 11653 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11653 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. UMAY KULSUM FAROOQ (WRONGLY MENTIONED AS UMAYA KULSUM FAROOQ IN FIR) D/O MOHAMMED FAROOK SHAIKH FAREED AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS 2. MOHAMMED FAROOK SHAIKH FAREED S/O SHAIKH FAREED AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS 3. LUBNA ANJUM WRONGLY MENTION LUMBHAN ANJUM IN FIR W/O MOHAMMED FAROOK SHAIKH FAREED AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS 4. MOHAMMED ABBAS S/O MOHAMMED FAROOK SHAIKH FAREED AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS 5. AMATHUL HANNAN WRONGLY MENTIONED AS AMRUTHUL HANNAN IN FIR D/O MOHAMMED FAROOK SHAIKH FAREED AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS PETITIONER NOs.1 TO 5 ARE R/AT NO.11, 2ND FLOOR 5TH CROSS, S K GARDEN Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49005 CRL.P No. 11653 of 2023 BENGALURU-560 046. 6. ABDUL SAIF AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R/AT SULTANPALYA NEAR TAQWA MASJID BENGALURU-560 032. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. SUNITHA H.SINGH, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY HSR LAYOUT POLICE STATION BENGALURU-560 102. REPRESENTED BY THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER. 2. SYED HUMAID UR RAHAMAN S/O SYED HAFEEZ UR RAHAMAN AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/AT NO.16TH CROSS 5TH MAIN ROAD, HSR LAYOUT 6TH SECTOR, BENGALURU-560 102. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VINAY MAHADEVAIAH, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO QUASH THE CHARGE SHEET SUBMITTED IN CR.NO.305/2022 FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 506, 504, 384, 448 R/W 34 OF IPC AGAINST THE PETITIONERS WHICH IS PENDING BEFORE THE XXXVII ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, BENGALURU BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49005 CRL.P No. 11653 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER On 19.09.2025, the following order was passed: "No representation for the petitioners. As a last chance, two weeks time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which necessary orders would be passed for dismissal of the petition." 2. Even today also learned counsel for the petitioners is absent and the office objections have not yet been complied with. The criminal petition is of the year 2023 and it appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. 3. For the said reason, the criminal petition is hereby dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE PGG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8