AVNISH KUMAR KATIYAR v. THE STATE OF UP AND 6 OTHERS
WTAX/4621/2025 · 2025-09-22
Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar J Criminal, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 81226 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 81226 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT TAX No. - 4621 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI, J.
1. Heard counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is aggrieved by the notice dated April 2, 2022 issued in respect of taxes and additional taxes under Sections 4 and 6 of the U.P. Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1997.
3. Upon hearing learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties and perusing the documents, we are of the view that the petitioner should move an application under Rule 22-A of the Uttar Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Rules, 1998 against the notice dated April 2, 2022 before the respondent authorities. In the event petitioner moves such an application within a period of two weeks from date, the authorities are directed to grant an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, and thereafter, pass a reasoned order in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of filing of the representation. No coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner for a period of ten weeks or till the application of the decided whichever is earlier.
4. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. September 23, 2025 Rakesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Raj Sachan, Rajesh Kumar Sachan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Praveen Kumar Giri,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Avnish Kumar Katiyar .....Petitioner(s) The State Of Up And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH MEHTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad