- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44794 WP No. 35054 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.35054 OF 2015 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MR. HOTHUR SHADAB WAHAB SON OF MR. HOTHUR ABDUL WAHAB, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS AT EMBITEE COMPLEX BELLARY ROAD HOSPET - 583201. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. S SUSHANT VENKATESH PAI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE BANK OF INDIA STRESSED ASSETS MANAGEMENT GROUP BRANCH NO.61, 4TH FLOOR RESIDENCY PLAZA RESIDENCY ROAD BANGALORE - 560025 REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. A. RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE LETTER DATED 29.05.2013 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-A; AND ETC. Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44794 WP No. 35054 of 2015 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. In this writ petition, petitioner is assailing the letter dated 29.05.2013 (Annexure-A) issued by the respondent - Bank. 3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties, on careful consideration of Annexure-A, wherein the respondent-Bank has addressed letter to the petitioner expressing its inability to release the personal guarantee of the petitioner, as petitioner's liability is still pending consideration and in this regard, it is also stated in the statement of objections at para 9(d) that the controversy between the petitioner and the bank is pending consideration before the Debts Recovery Tribunal in O.A.No.877/2012. In that view of the matter, no interference is called for in this writ petition. However, with reference to the relief sought in this writ - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44794 WP No. 35054 of 2015 petition, it is open for the petitioner to approach the competent Tribunal for redressal of his grievances. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29