ADIL KHAN @ ADILSHIVARAM PRASAD v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
CRL.A/1883/2025 · 2025-10-16
K S Mudagal, Venkatesh Naik T
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 81213 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 81213 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41321-DB CRL.A No.1883/2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1883/2025 (C)
BETWEEN:
1.
ADIL KHAN @ ADILSHIVARAM PRASAD S/O SHABBIR KHAN AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R/AT NO.5, NEAR SAI BABA TEMPLE BESIDE WELDING SHOP MUTTYALAMMANAGAR RAILWAY UNDERPASS YESHWANTHAPURA BANGALORE - 560 038
2.
SYED SALMAN @ SALLU S/O JAKRIYA AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS R/AT MEHABOOB, OPP. TO BUDA MASJIT PIPELINE ROAD, SHAMANNA GARDEN VIJAYANAGARA, BANGALORE - 560 040 … APPELLANTS
(BY SRI.DARSHAN M.S., ADVOCATE FOR SRI.KRISHNE GOWDA M., ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA STATE BY THALAGHATTAPURA POLICE REPTD. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE - 560 001 …RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.VIJAYAKUMAR MAJAGE., SPP-II)
Digitally signed by SREEDHARAN BANGALORE SUSHMA LAKSHMI Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41321-DB CRL.A No.1883/2025
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 374(2) CR.PC (FILED UNDER SECTION 415(2) OF BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT OF CONVICTION DATED 23.08.2025 AND SENTENCE DATED 28.08.2025 IN SC NO.125/2021 (COMMON ORDER PASSED IN SC NOS.128/2020 C/W 125/2021) OF THALAGHATTAPURA POLICE BY THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, FTSC-I BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT BENGALURU CONVICTING THE APPELLANT FOR OFFENCES UNDER SECTIONS 143, 302 R/W SEC.149 OF IPC AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL)
Learned counsel for the appellant files memo for withdrawal of the appeal. Recording the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (K.S.MUDAGAL) JUDGE
Sd/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE KLY CT: JL