Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 81209 (KAR)

KIRAN KUMAR G v. MR. GIRISH NAYAK

WP/15675/2025 · 2025-09-01

Sachin Shankar Magadum

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34162 WP No. 15675 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 15675 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: KIRAN KUMAR G S/O GOVIND RAJU, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, NO.12, 3RD CROSS, 8TH BLOCK, NAGARABHAVI, BANGALORE - 560 072. PHONE: 9743791442. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. UMAPATHI S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MR. GIRISH NAYAK POLICE INSPECTOR, CHENNAMMANAKERE ACHUKATTU POLICE STATION, BANGALORE CITY - 560 085. 2. MR. LOKESH SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHENNAMMANAKERE ACHUKATTU POLICE STATION, BANGALORE CITY - 560 085. 3. MR. ARAVIND KUMAR SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHENNAMMANAKERE ACHUKATTU POLICE STATION, BANGALORE CITY-560085. 4. MALIKARJUNA POLICE STAFF, CHENNAMMANAKERE ACHUKATTU POLICE STATION, Digitally signed by AL BHAGYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34162 WP No. 15675 of 2025 BANGALORE CITY-560085. 5. MR. SHIVAMURTHY POLICE STAFF, CHENNAMMANAKERE ACHUKATTU POLICE STATION, BANGALORE CITY-560085. 6. MR. NAGARAJ NAIK POLICE STAFF, CHENNAMMANAKERE ACHUKATTU POLICE STATION, BANGALORE CITY - 560 085. 7. MR. HANUMANTA POLICE STAFF, CHENNAMMANAKERE ACHUKATTU POLICE STATION, BANGALORE CITY - 560 085. …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, READ WITH SECTION 528 OF BNSS, 2023 PRAYING TO A. ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 11.04.2025 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE, AT BANGALORE IN P.C.R. NO. 35/2024 (ANNEXURE-A) AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FRESH MATTERS LIST, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM ORAL ORDER The private complaint filed under Section 200 of Cr.P.C. is dismissed vide order dated 11.4.2025. 2. Petitioner has the remedy of an appeal under Section 378(4) of Cr.P.C. Therefore, this petition under Section 482 is not maintainable. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34162 WP No. 15675 of 2025 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. 4. However, liberty is reserved to prefer an appeal in the manner known to law. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE ALB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 67