Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28690 RPFC No. 6 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 6 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
MR. THASEEN ULLA KHAN S/O SAMIULLA KHAN, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, RESIDING AT 8TH MAIN, LINGARAJAPURAM, NEW BAGALURU LAYOUT, BENGALURU NORTH, BENGALURU-560 005. …PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PATIL BHARATI TAMMANAGOUDA, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
1.
MRS. ROOHI TABASSUM W/O THASEEN ULLA KHAN, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
2.
M.D. ABBAS KHAN S/O THASEEN ULLA KHAN, AGED ABOUT 07 YEARS,
3.
ANIYA TAHAREEN T.K.
D/O THASEEN ULLA KHAN AGED ABOUT 11 YEARS,
RESPONDENT NO.2 & 3 ARE MINORS, REPRESENTED BY THEIR NATURAL GUARDIAN RESPONDENT NO.1
RESIDING AT NEAR RIYAZ ULLA MASJID, 2ND CROSS, 2ND MAIN, SADASHIVANAGAR, TUMAKURU. …RESPONDENTS
Digitally signed by LAKSHMI T Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28690 RPFC No. 6 of 2022
THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT, 1984, PRAYING TO (A) CALL FOR RECORDS IN CRL.MIS.NO.163/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT AT TUMAKURU, AFTER GOING THROUGH THE LEGALITY, PROPRIETY AND OTHERWISE OF THE SAME; (B) SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 19.08.2021 PASSED ON I.A.NO.2 UNDER SECTION 125(2) OF CR.P.C. FILED BY THE RESPONDENTS IN CRL.MIS.NO.163 OF 2020 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT AT TUMAKURU.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
ORAL ORDER
The RPFC is of the year 2022. Till now, no steps are taken for issuance of notice to the respondents.
2. When the matter was listed on 18.7.2025, as there was no representation on behalf of both the parties and no notice is served on the respondents, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption for 'dismissal' today.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28690 RPFC No. 6 of 2022
3. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, it appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter.
4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
TL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36