Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 81202 (ALL)

SMT. REKHA DUBEY v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/10915/2025 · 2025-07-31

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:128846 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10915 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Rekha Dubey Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhishek Rai,Chandan Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main prayer:- "a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding upon the respondents to pay the post retiral benefits and pension to the petitioner under Old Pension Scheme (OPS) forthwith, as per Govt. Order dated 19.11.2024." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into merits of the case, made an innocuous prayer that the petitioner may be permitted to file a fresh representation before respondent no.2 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State- respondents vehemently opposed the writ petition on merits, but has not opposed the innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri D.P. Singh, learned Standing Counsel appeared on advance accepted notice on behalf of the State-respondent nos.1 and 2, perused the contents made in the writ petition and the documents on record. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. Petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.2 within two weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. After receiving the said representation, respondent no.2, Director of Education (Higher Education), U.P., Prayagraj is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. . (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Order Date :- 1.8.2025 Atul Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad