Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 81182 (PNJ)

SURJIT SINGH AND ANR v. D K TIWARI

COCP/2685/2023 · 2025-03-24

Harkesh Manuja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP No.2685 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 118 SURJIT SINGH AND ANR Vs D K TIWARI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ Present: Mr. Kuldeep Saini, Advocate for Mr. for the petitioner. Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G., Punjab. HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) 1. Learned has been stayed by the Hon’ble 29.05.2019 passed in 2. In view of the above, the present petition at this stage, however, seeks liberty to revive the present petition, subject to final outcome of the aforementioned 3. Dismissed as 4. Rule stands discharged. March 24, 2025 Atik Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2023 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2685 of 2023 (O&M) Date of Decision: SURJIT SINGH AND ANR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ Mr. Kuldeep Saini, Advocate for Mr. Mohit Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G., Punjab. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel informs that the order passed by the Writ Court has been stayed by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court passed in LPA No.1125 of 2019. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner present petition at this stage, however, seeks liberty to revive the present petition, subject to final outcome of the aforementioned Dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. Rule stands discharged. (HARKESH MANUJA) 5 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2685 of 2023 (O&M) Date of Decision: 24.03.2025 ......Petitioners ....Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G., Punjab. counsel informs that the order passed by the Writ Court Division Bench of this Court vide order dated learned counsel for the petitioners does not press present petition at this stage, however, seeks liberty to revive the present petition, subject to final outcome of the aforementioned LPA. not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 1 counsel informs that the order passed by the Writ Court vide order dated does not press present petition at this stage, however, seeks liberty to revive the present MOHMED ATIK 2025.03.25 09:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment