Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8118 (AP)

M/S. MEENAKSHI ENERGY PVT.LTD.,HYDERABAD. v. GARIKIPATI NARAIAH, SPSR NELLORE DIST.,& 5 OTRS.

WA/677/2014 · 2025-01-27

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam, R Raghunandan Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVA MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT APPEAL NO: 677 OF 2014 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 18.11.2013 in W.P. No. 32245/2010 on the file of the High Court. Between: M/s. Meenakshi Energy Pvt. Ltd., Rep by its Senior Manager, Mr.Devineni Venkateswara Rao, S/o. Sri Ch Kondaiah, Aged about40 years, r/o H No. 6-3-609/99, 2 nd Floor, Flat # 202, Hari Priya Residency, Anand Nagar Colony, Khairatabad, Hyderabad, A.P., ...Appellant/ Respondent No.6 in WP No.32245/2010 AND 1. Garikipati Naraiah, S/o. Penchalaiah, Aged about 70 years, R/o Chinnacherukuru, T.P.Gudur Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. ...Respondent/ Writ Petitioner in W.P.No.32245/201d 2. The Government of A.P., Rep by its Secretary, Industries & commerce Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 3. The District Collector, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Gudur, SPSR Nellore Dist. 5. The Tahsildar, Chillakuru Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. 6. M/s. K.P.C.L., SEZ rep by its M.D., O/o. Krishnapatnam Port Co., Ltd., Muthukur Village & Mandal, SPSR Nellore District ...Respondents/Respondents w l A. NO: 3 OF 2014fWAMP. NO: 1441 OF 2014^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the common Judgement rendered by this Hon'ble Court in W.P. No. 32245 of 2010 dated 18-11-2013, pending disposal of the above writ appeal. Counsel for the Appellant: SRI P. HEMACHANDRA Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI M. K. RAJ KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR INDUSTRIES COMMERCE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 to 5: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.6: SRI B. P. MOHAN P. ROY REDDY(SC FOR APIIC) Counsel for the Respondents: SRI P. GANGA RAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ASSIGNMENT The Court made the following: ORDER T APHC010084772014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3508] MONDAY ,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT APPEAL NO: 677/2014 Between: M/s. Meenakshi Energy Pvt.ltd.,hyderabad. ...APPELLANT AND Garikipati Naraiah Spsr Nellore Dist 5 Otrs and ...RESPONDENT(S) Others Counsel for the Appellant: 1.P HEMACHANDRA Counsel for the Respondent{S): 1.GP FOR ASSIGNMENT 2.GP FOR REVENUE 3.B P MOHAN P ROY REDDY{SC FOR APIIC) 4.M KRAJ KUMAR 5.PGANGA RAMI REDDY 6.GP FOR INDUSTRIES COMMERCE The Court made the following: (perHon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) ORDER: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ appeal does not survive and it has become infructuous. Accordingly, the present Writ Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. SDl- K. TATA RAO deputy; registrar i //true copy// s H OFFICER To, One CC to Sri P. Hemachandra. Advocate [OPUC] - i Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] Roy Reddy, SC for APllC [OPUC] 1 2. One CC to Sri P. Ganga Rami 3. One CC to Sri B. P. Mohan P. Advocate [OPUC] Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] High Court of Andhra 4. One CC to Sri M. K. Raj Kumar GP for Assignment, High 5. Two CCS to 6. Two Pradesh. [OUT] CCS to GP for Revenue, High CCS to GP for Industries and Commerce Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 7. Two 8. Three CD Copies. ssb 9 HIGH COURT DATED:27/01/2025 ORDER WA.No.677 of 2014 ^AND, 5 01 MAR 2025 ^ . Current Section . m '• / DISMISSING THE W.A. AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS