HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 26534 of 2025 Court No. - 67 HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. On the matter being taken up, learned Additional Government Advocate upon instructions submits that in paragraph No. 21 of the affidavit filed in support of the bail application it is mentioned that applicant has criminal history of two cases being Case Crime No. 96 of 2024, under Sections 147, 148, 323, 326, 386, 427, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Highway, District Mathura and Case Crime No. 170 of 2024, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 336, 307 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali, District Mathura, whereas apart from this case the applicant has criminal history of following four cases:- (i) Case Crime No. 873 of 2023, under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali, District Mathura. (ii) Case Crime No. 478 of 2024, under Sections 125, 324(4), 351(2), 352 B.N.S., Police Station Mogarah, District Mathura, (iii) Case Crime No. 96 of 2024, under Sections 147, 148, 323, 326, 386, 427, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Highway, District Mathura. (iv) Case Crime No. 170 of 2024, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 336, 307 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali, District Mathura. 2. In response, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant does not want to press this bail application and he may be permitted to withdraw this bail application with liberty to file fresh bail Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rohit Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Devesh Kumar Sharma, G.A. Priyanshu .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) application. 3. Learned Additional Government Advocate representing the State and Mr. Devesh Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the complainant do not have any objection to such prayer made on behalf of the applicant. 4. In view of the above, the instant bail application is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed for. 5. Office is directed to return the certified copies of the documents, if any, to the counsel for the applicant after retaining photostat copies thereof on record. 6. It is made clear that since the instant bail application is not heard on its merit, therefore, in case second bail application is moved, the same shall not be treated as tied up or part heard to this Bench. August 25, 2025 Kashifa BAIL No. 26534 of 2025 2 (Sanjay Kumar Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- KASHIFA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad