Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 81124 (ALL)

PANKAJ YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/16694/2025 · 2025-08-17

Abdul Shahid, Siddhartha Varma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:140192-DB Court No. - 43 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16694 of 2025 Petitioner :- Pankaj Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Deep Narayan,Mukhtesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. Hon'ble Abdul Shahid,J. Sri Mukhtesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner states that due to efflux of time the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous. He therefore prays that the writ petition be dismissed as having become infructuous. In view of the above statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. Order Date :- 18.8.2025 M.S. Ansari (Abdul Shahid,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD SAQIB ANSARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad