Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28460 WP No. 24123 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 24123 OF 2024 (GM-FC) BETWEEN:
SRI. JAGADEESH JAYACHANDRA S/O JAYACHANDRA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS RESIDENT OF MATHRUSHREE NILAYA DEVARAJA URS ROAD, NEAR LADIES HOSTEL VIDYANAGARA, HASSAN KARANATAKA-573 201. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MILASH ARROL NORONHA, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND:
1.
MRS. SUSHMITHA R W/O JAGDEESH JAYACHANDRA D/O RANGASWAMY AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS
2.
MASTER SHOURYA S/O JAGADEESH JAYACHANDRA AGED ABOUT 3 YEARS SINCE MINOR REPRESENTED BY HIS MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN MRS. SUSHMITHA R W/O JAGADEESH JAYACHANDRA D/O RANGASWAMY BOTH THE RESPONDENTS ARE RESIDENTS OF Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28460 WP No. 24123 of 2024 NO. 617, 4TH CROSS, I BLOCK RAMAKRISHNANAGARA MYSURU, KARANATAKA-570 022.
(R2- MINOR) …RESPONDENTS
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 12/08/2024 ON IA NO. 2 UNDER SECTION 125(1) OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE 1973 IN C. MIX. NO. 445 OF 2021 PASSED BY THE LEARNED PRINCIPAL JUDGE FAMILY COURT AND JMFC AT MYSURU VIDE ANNX-H.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER This petition is of the year 2024. Even till now, PF has not been paid for issuance of notice to the respondents and office objections are not complied with. So many opportunities are given to the petitioner to comply with the office objections.
2. When the matter was listed on 22.07.2025, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, this Court had directed the matter to be listed for 'dismissal' on
23.07.2025.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28460 WP No. 24123 of 2024
3. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, it appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter.
4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE CR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 64