Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:133616 Court No. - 70 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 26941 of 2025 Applicant :- Rajan Rathi Alias Rajan Singh Parihar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Shakti Shanker Tiwari,Subhash Chandra Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material brought on record. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. The F.I.R. was lodged by the police against three accused including the applicant. Initially the police arrested one accused Sanjay Upadhyay on the information of informer and in his confessional statement that accused states that he along with the Rahul Dev Chaudhary and the applicant used to commit the crime of chain snatching. It is then the present F.I.R. was lodged against three accused including the applicant. Learned counsel further submits that nothing has been recovered from the applicant and if any such recovery is made the same has been implanted upon the applicant. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused have also been mentioned. It has also been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required and is also ready to accept all the conditions which the Court may deem fit to impose upon him. He next submits that there are three other criminal cases into the credit of applicant in which he is on bail. The applicant is languishing in jail since 19.05.2025. 3. Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant but he could not dispute the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant. 4. Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of allegations, the gravity of offence and without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail. Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed. 5. Let the applicant-Rajan Rathi Alias Rajan Singh Parihar, be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No. 170 of 2025, under Sections 309(4), 317(2) of B.N.S., Police Station- Bisrakh, District- Gautqam Budh Nagar, on executing a personal bond and furnishing two local sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence. ii) The applicant shall not threaten or harass the prosecution witnesses. iii) The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court. iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which the applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission. v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. 6. In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, the court concerned shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of applicant in accordance with law. Order Date :- 6.8.2025 Mustaqeem. Digitally signed by :- MOHD MUSTAQEEM KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad