P a g e | 1 Items No. 42-44 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL PIL No. 24 of 2017 Court on its own motion Appellants Vs. State of Manipur Respondent With MC(PIL) No. 14 of 2019 With MC(PIL) No. 6 of 2025 BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. D. KRISHNAKUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA ORDER 16.04.2025 (D. Krishnakumar, C.J) : [1] Mr. I. Denning, learned Amicus Curiae is present; Ms. N. Jyotsana, learned counsel, appears for the State respondents; Mr. M. Rarry, learned senior counsel, appears for the applicant in MC(PIL) No. 6 of 2025; Mr. H. Kenajit, learned counsel, appears for the Loktak Development Authority and Mr. Boboy Potsangbam, learned CGSC, appears for the Union of India. [2] Report has been filed by the learned Amicus Curiae and we will appreciate the Amicus Curiae for inspecting the site in question and this Court has already indicated that whatever expenses are made out by the Amicus Curiae, he can claim from the applicant Department. [3] The learned Amicus Curiae fairly states that he is not interested to claim the expenses made out by him during the aforesaid inspection period of the SHAMURAILATPAM SUSHIL SHARMA Digitally signed by SHAMURAILATPAM SUSHIL SHARMA Date: 2025.04.16 16:29:49 +05'30' P a g e | 2 site in question and therefore, this Court is appreciating the learned Amicus Curiae for his generosity for inspecting the place without seeking any financial assistance from the applicant Department. [4] List the matters on 21.04.2025. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Sushil