Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 81094 (KAR)

SMT DHANALAKSHMI G v. SRI R RAVI

MFA/730/2023 · 2025-08-14

Lok Adalath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF AUGUST 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE SRI. JUSTICE K.V.ARAVIND & SRI. PAVANA CHANDRA SHETTY.H, MEMBER M.F.A.No.730/2023 (MV) (Lok Adalat No.5225/2025) BETWEEN 1 . SMT. DHANALAKSHMI .G W/O LATE C.MANJUNATHA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, 2 . KUMARI VARSHINI D/O LATE C. MANJUNATHA, AGED 6 YEARS, MINOR REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER AS NATURAL GUARIDAN, BOTH ARE R/AT NO.1714, 4TH CROSS, GANESHA TEMPLE, SANJEEVINI NAGAR, KODIGEHALLI, BENGALURU NORTH, SAHAKAR NAGAR POST, BENGALURU- 560092. ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI.VASANTHAPPA, ADVOCATE) 2 AND 1 . SRI. R. RAVI S/O PALANIYAPPAN, MAJOR BY AGE, R/AT CHANDAPURA, ANEKAL MAIN ROAD, ANEKAL, BENGALURU-562106. 2. THE MANAGER MAGMA, HDI GEN. INS. CO. LTD, MINERVA CIRCLE, J.C.ROAD, BENGALURU – 560027. 3. SMT. NARAYANAMMA, W/O LATE CHANDRAPPA, D/O MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS. 4. SRI. PRAKASH .C S/O LATE CHANDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, RESPONDENT NO3 & 4 ARE R/AT: KUDIYANUR VILLAGE, MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT – 563130. ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.C. SHIVANNE GOWDA ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.2) MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 04.05.2022 PASSED IN MVC NO.6795/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND MACT, BENGALURU SCCH-11, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM 3 PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellants - Claimants is present. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative is present. 2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellants/claimants (being authorized by the appellants/claimants to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellants-claimants have agreed to receive and the respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. 3. The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of 4 award, failing which, the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 4. The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be released in favour of the appellant No.1/ respondent No.3, on proper identification. 5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER SRK