Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8109 (GAU)

RATI RAM BORO v. SUNIL BORO AND ORS

I.A.(Civil)/816/2025 · 2025-04-24

Devashis Baruah

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010038782025 2025:GAU-AS:5093 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/816/2025 RATI RAM BORO S/O- LATE GOPI NATH BORO, R/O- VILL.- GHORAMARA, MOUZA- BIJNI, P.S. SALBARI, DIST. BAKSA, ASSAM, PIN- 781318. VERSUS SUNIL BORO AND ORS S/O- LATE DHEMA BORO, R/O- VILL.- GHORAMARA, MOUZA- BIJNI, P.S. SALBARI, DIST. BAKSA, ASSAM, PIN- 781301. 2:HAREN KHERKETARY S/O- LATE RATNESWAR KHERKETARY R/O- VILL.- GHORAMARA MOUZA- BIJNI P.S. SALBARI DIST. BAKSA ASSAM PIN- 781301. 3:SUBAL OJAH S/O BIBI BALA OJAH R/O- NEAR SBI BARPETA BRANCH P.S. AND DIST. BARPETA ASSAM PIN- 781301. 4:DIPUOJAH S/O BIBI BALA OJAH R/O- NEAR SBI BARPETA BRANCH Page No.# 2/4 P.S. AND DIST. BARPETA ASSAM PIN- 781301. 5:ANIMA OJAH D/O BIBI BALA OJAH R/O- NEAR SBI BARPETA BRANCH P.S. AND DIST. BARPETA ASSAM PIN- 781301. 6:USHA OJAH D/O BIBI BALA OJAH R/O- NEAR SBI BARPETA BRANCH P.S. AND DIST. BARPETA ASSAM PIN- 781301. 7:FUL KUMARI OJAH D/O BIBI BALA OJAH R/O- NEAR SBI BARPETA BRANCH P.S. AND DIST. BARPETA ASSAM PIN- 781301. 8:SABITA OJAH D/O BIBI BALA OJAH R/O- NEAR SBI BARPETA BRANCH P.S. AND DIST. BARPETA ASSAM PIN- 781301 Linked Case : CRP(IO)/297/2024 RATI RAM BORO S/O- LATE GOPI NATH BORO R/O- VILL.- GHORAMARA MOUZA- BIJNI P.S. SALBARI DIST. BAKSA ASSAM Page No.# 3/4 PIN- 781318. VERSUS SUNIL BORO AND 2 ORS. S/O- LATE DHEMA BORO R/O- VILL.- GHORAMARA MOUZA- BIJNI P.S. SALBARI DIST. BAKSA ASSAM PIN- 781301. 2:HAREN KHERKETARY S/O- LATE RATNESWAR KHERKETARY R/O- VILL.- GHORAMARA MOUZA- BIJNI P.S. SALBARI DIST. BAKSA ASSAM PIN- 781301. 3:BIBI BALA OJAH W/O- LATE RAMESH CHANDRA OJAH R/O- NEAR SBI BARPETA BRANCH P.S. AND DIST. BARPETA ASSAM PIN- 781301. For the applicant(s) : Mr. S. Das, Advocate For the respondent (s) : Mr. A. R. Sikdar, Advocate BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R 25.04.2025 Heard Mr. S. Das, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant and Mr. A. R. Sikdar, the learned counsel appearing Page No.# 4/4 on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 & 2. 2. Mr. S. Das, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that inadvertently the respondent No.3 has been impleaded as a party in the accompanying application though the respondent No.3 expired prior to the filing of the revision application and his legal heirs have already been substituted by the learned Trial Court. He therefore submits that the present application has been filed for striking out the name of the respondent No.3 and insertion of the names of the opposite party Nos.3(a) to 3(f) to the accompanying revision application. 3. Taking into account the above, the names of the opposite party Nos.3(a) to 3(f) are impleaded as the respondent Nos.3(a) to 3(f) in the accompanying revision application. 4. The applicant is directed to file fresh Memo of Parties forthwith before the Registry of this Court and not later than 7 days. The Registry shall thereupon make necessary correction in the records on the basis of the instant order and fresh Memo of Parties and further upload the same in the CIS. 5. Accordingly, the instant I.A. stands allowed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant