- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30825 WP No. 11301 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 11301 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. VINOD KUMAR AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/A 170/16, 20TH CROSS 7TH MAIN, C BLOCK, SAHAKARANAGAR BENGALURU-560092 2. PARUL CHAUDHARY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/O 170/16, 20TH CROSS 7TH MAIN, C BLOCK SAHAKARNAGAR BENGALURU-560092 3. TRILOKI NATH CHALLU AGED ABOUT 96 YEARS R/O E 1802, PURVA HIGHLANDS HOLIDAYS VILLAGE ROAD MALLASANDRA BENGALURU-560062 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. REYNOLD DSOUZA., ADVOCATE FOR P1 & P2; SRI. SATHISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR P3) Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30825 WP No. 11301 of 2024 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT BENGALURU-560009 2. THE SPECIAL TAHASILDAR BANGALORE NORTH TALUK KANDHAYA BHAVAN K G ROAD BENGALURU-560009 3. OZONE URBANA INFRA DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.38, ULSOOR ROAD BENGALURU-560042 THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE MANAGING DIRECTOR …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA FOR R1 & R2; SMT. VANDANA P.L., ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R1 AND R2 TO ENFORCE PAYMENT OF AMOUNTS DUE FROM R3 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROCEDURE FOR RECOVERY PROVIDED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF KARNATAKA LAND REVENUE ACT, 1964 AND RULES THEREUNDER, FOR ENFORCEMENT OF THE DIRECTIONS OF K-RERA UNDER ANNEXURE-C WHICH IS REVENUE RECOVERY CERTIFICATE AND COMPLY WITH THE K-RERA ORDERS AT ANNEXURE-A WHICH IS K-RERA JUDGEMENTS. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30825 WP No. 11301 of 2024 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD ORAL ORDER If a memo for withdrawal is filed on 27.02.2025 on behalf of the first and second petitioners; presently, a memo is filed for the same purpose on behalf of the third petitioner. Thus, it is now brought on record that all the three petitioners want to withdraw the petition, and hence, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn subject to all just exceptions in law. Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE RB