SADAN MOHAN TRIPATHI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/11063/2025 · 2025-08-04
Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 81086 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 81086 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:131900 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 11063 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sadan Mohan Tripathi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajendra Prasad Tiwari,Ram Kumar Ojha,Vinay Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main prayer:-
"Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to allow the writ petition and direct the concerned respondents to considering the claim of difference of the salary since 22.05.15. to 30.06.20 and pension of the post of Officiating Principle since 01.07.20 to till now as Arrears and continuously pay the pension of the Officiating Principal by consider the representation dated 04.07.25 submitted before the office of the Respondent No-3 as Annexure No. 01 to this writ petition."
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into merits of the case, made an innocuous prayer that the petitioner may be permitted to file a fresh representation before respondent no.3 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State- respondents vehemently opposed the writ petition on merits, but has not opposed the innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri Ashish Kumar Dubey, learned Standing Counsel appeared on advance accepted notice on behalf of the State-respondents, perused the contents made in the writ petition and the documents on record. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow
the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. Petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.3 within 10 days from the date of production of certified copy of this order. After receiving the said representation, respondent no.3, D.I.O.S., Gorakhpur is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation. 6.
With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. . (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Order Date :- 5.8.2025 Atul Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad