- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46120 MSA No. 89 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO. 89 OF 2024 (LA) BETWEEN: SODHE VADIRAJA MUTT UDUPI TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT REP. BY ITS SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY MR. MURALI KRISHNA BHAT S/O VEDAVYASA BHAT AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS WORKING AT CAR STREET SODHE MUTT, UDUPI …APPELLANT (BY SRI: CHANDRANATH ARIGA K, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. LOHITHAKSHI AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS 2. VISHALAKSHI AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS 3. SHRIKANTH V. UDIWAR AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS 4. JAJI VITLA KOTIAN AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS 5. VENUGOPALA V UDIWAR AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS Digitally signed by NANDINI B G Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46120 MSA No. 89 of 2024 6. RAMANANDA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 7. SAINATHA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS ALL ARE CHILDRENS OF RENUKA R/AT NEAR POST OFFICE MATADANGADI UDYAVARA VILLAGE-574 1148 UDUPI TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT 8. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER KUNDAPURA-576 201 …RESPONDENTS THIS MSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.54(2) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 15.02.2024 PASSED IN MA NO.12/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, UDUPI., DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT DATED 6.06.2022 PASSED IN LAC.100/2013 ON THE FILE THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, UDUPI. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant prays for time to cure the defects. 2. The appeal is listed for 7th time for compliance of office objections. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46120 MSA No. 89 of 2024 3. The order sheet dated 05.11.2025 reads as under: "Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has complied with the office objection Nos.1, 3 to 6. He prays three days time to comply with office objection No.2. The appeal is of the year 2024. The matter is listed for sixth time for compliance of office objections. Even though, I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter, to afford one more opportunity list on 12.11.2025." Inspite of that, there is no compliance. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non compliance of office objections. SD/- (M G UMA) JUDGE BGN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2