[2025:RJ-JP:15408] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2655/2025 Ramsingh S/o Prahlad, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Kumharo Ka Mohalla, Sangod, Police Station Sangod, District Kota. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Teeka Ram Meena For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 07/04/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.3/2025 registered at Police Station Sangod, District Kota Rural (Rajasthan) for the offence punishable under Section 8/21 of NDPS Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that false recovery of 6.15 gms of Smack has been shown from the possession of the petitioner. Counsel submits that alleged recovered contraband is marginally above the small quantity. Counsel submits that charge-sheet has been filed in this matter and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Petitioner is in custody since 04.01.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. [2025:RJ-JP:15408] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2655/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. She submits that petitioner is habitual offender and several other cases including NDPS Act have been registered against him. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that alleged recovered contraband is below commercial quantity; charge-sheet has been filed in this matter and trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. The bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner- Ramsingh S/o Prahlad shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence weekly in the concerned police station. 8. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the [2025:RJ-JP:15408] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2655/2025] notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. 9. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /171