Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8107 (CHH)

DR. (SMT.) SHADHANA KASAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/889/2025 · 2025-02-14

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2025:CGHC:7907 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 889 of 2025 1 - Dr. (Smt.) Shadhana Kasar W/o Shri Bharat Singh Aged About 65 Years R/o Behind Panchsheel Club, Ward No. 26, Mahasamund, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Urban Development, New Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Secretary, Department Of Agriculture, New Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Collector, District Mahasamund (C.G.) 4 - Sub Divisional Officeer (Revenue), Sub Division- Mahasamund District- Mahasamund (C.G.) 5 - Tahsildar, Tahsil- Mahasamund, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) 6 - Chief Municipal Officer, Municipal Council, Mahasamund, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) 2 / 2 7 - Vinod Ratre R/o Kumharpara, Mahasamund District Mahasamund (C.G.) 8 - Santosh Kumar R/o Near Office Of The Member Of Legislative Assembly, Mahasamund, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. A. N. Bhakta and Mr. Vivek Bhakta, Advocates For Respondents/State : Ms. Nupoor Sonkar, Panel Lawyer (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 14/02/2025 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach before the Municipal Council, Mahasamund for compounding of excess construction made by the petitioner under the Municipal Council Act, 1961. 2. No objection from the other side. 3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as stated supra. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE $. Bhilwar