CWP-20404-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Harminder Singh and others State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present: SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE 1. the Consent to Operate granted in favour of manufacturing unit Pollution) Act, 1974. 2. Act, 1974, under Section 28 provides for an appeal before the State Government against the orders passed by the State Board under Section 25. 3. therefore, this Court, without commenting on merits of the case, declining 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Harminder Singh and others Versus Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Ms. Sumanpreet Aulakh, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Vipin Pal Yadav, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Maninder Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.11. **** SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE ( Oral ) The petitioners are residents of Jalandhar and are aggrieved by the Consent to Operate granted in favour of manufacturing unit under Section 25 of Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974. The special statute of Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, under Section 28 provides for an appeal before the State Government against the orders passed by the State Board under Section 25. The petitioners are free to avail the aforesaid remedy and, therefore, this Court, without commenting on merits of the case, declining -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-20404-2025 Date of decision : 21.07.2025 …….Petitioner ...….Respondents JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY , Advocate, Vipin Pal Yadav, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Maninder Singh, Advocate, ( Oral ) e petitioners are residents of Jalandhar and are aggrieved by the Consent to Operate granted in favour of respondent No.12 qua ice under Section 25 of Water (Prevention and Control of The special statute of Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, under Section 28 provides for an appeal before the State Government against the orders passed by the State Board under Section 25. re free to avail the aforesaid remedy and, therefore, this Court, without commenting on merits of the case, declining 2025 .2025 …….Petitioners ...….Respondents e petitioners are residents of Jalandhar and are aggrieved by qua ice under Section 25 of Water (Prevention and Control of The special statute of Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, under Section 28 provides for an appeal before the State Government against the orders passed by the State Board under Section 25. re free to avail the aforesaid remedy and, therefore, this Court, without commenting on merits of the case, declining NAROTAM DASS 2025.07.22 10:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-20404-2025 interference and reserving liberty to the petitioners to avail remedy of appeal disposes of this petition. July 21, 2025 narotam Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2025 interference and reserving liberty to the petitioners to avail remedy of appeal disposes of this petition. July 21, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable -2- interference and reserving liberty to the petitioners to avail remedy of appeal ( SHEEL NAGU ) CHIEF JUSTICE ( SANJIV BERRY ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No interference and reserving liberty to the petitioners to avail remedy of appeal NAROTAM DASS 2025.07.22 10:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment