- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34240 WP No. 6649 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 6649 OF 2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI B DAYANAND, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, S/O SRI.BHUJANGA SAYANA, R/AT NO.32, GOVINDA REDDY LAYOUT, ARKERE, BENGLAURU - 560 076. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAGARAJU G M., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. SMT CHANDRIKA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, D/O SRI BHUJANGA SAYANA, W/O SRI.M.S.RAMU, R/AT NO.40/40, SPOORTHY NAGAR, VADERAHALLI, RAMANAGARA - 562 159. 2. SRI.B.MOHAN, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, S/O SRI.BHUJANGA SAYANA, R/AT NO.66/65, 3RD CROSS, MANJUNATHA LAYOUT, NEAR ARKERE NICO LAYOUT, ARKERE, BANNERGHATA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 076. Digitally signed by KAVYA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34240 WP No. 6649 of 2022 3. SMT.MAMATHA DEVI, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, D/O SRI BHUJANGA SAYANA, W/O SRI MANJUNATH, R/AT NO.66/65, 3RD CROSS, MANJUNATHA LAYOUT, NEAR ARKERE MICO LAYOUT, ARKERE, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BENGLAURU - 560 076. 4. SRI.BHUJANGASAYANA, AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS, S/O LATE CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA R/AT 808, 7TH CROSS, 11TH MAIN, MICO LAYOUT, BTM 2ND STAGE, BENGLAURU - 560 076. …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTION, TO SET ASIDE ANNEXURE-A, WHICH IS THE ORDER DATED 07/01/2022 PASSED BY THE XXXV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY (CCH-35) IN O.S. NO.6355/2021 AND ALLOW THE I.A.NO.3 FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER SEC.151 OF CPC IN O.S. NO.6355/2021 AND PASS SUCH OTHER ORDER/S WHICH ARE DEEMED TO BE FIT IN THE NATURE AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE ABOVE CASE AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34240 WP No. 6649 of 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO ORAL ORDER This Court, by order dated 18.08.2023, taking note of non-appearance of the parties and their counsel had passed the following order: "None appears for the petitioner. List after two weeks." 2. Even today, there is no representation either by the petitioner or by respondents. 3. In that view of the matter, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE KVR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27