AVADESH KUMAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS
WA/96/2024 · 2025-03-27
N Unni Krishnan Nair
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8105 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8105 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010038002024
2025:GAU-AS:3667-DB
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WA/96/2024 AVADESH KUMAR SINGH HEADMASTER , BAPUJI HIGH SCHOOL (HINDI MEDIUM), R/O- VILLAGE NAKHOLA, P.O AND P.S- JAGIROAD, DIST- MORIGAON, ASSAM, PIN-782410 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.
OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, DISPUR, GUWAHATI, ASSAM, PIN- 781006.
2:THE DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-19 ASSAM 3:THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS MORIGAON DISTRICT CIRCLE MORIGAON DIST- MORIGAON PIN-782105 4:THE DISTRICT LEVEL SCRUTINY COMMITTEE REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MORIGAON P.O AND DIST-MORIGAON ASSAM PIN-782105 5:RAMANAND JHA S/O- KRISHNA KANTA JHA C/O- LATE NAYAN TALIKDAR R/O- VILLAGE NAKHOLA P.O AND P.S- JAGIROAD DIST- MORIGAON ASSAM PIN-782410 6:THE SCHOOL MANAGING COMMITTEE BAPUJI HIGH SCHOOL (HINDI MEDIUM) REP. BY THE THEN PRESIDENT ACHHA LAL SAH S/O- LATE MAHESWAR SAH R/O- VILLAGE NAKHOLA P.O AND P.S- JAGIROAD DIST- MORIGAON ASSAM PIN-78241 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M K CHOUDHURY, MR. M SARMA,MRS. P BHARADWAJ Advocate for the Respondent : SC, SEC. EDU., MS. B DEVI (R-6),FOR CAVEATOR,MS F INTAZ,MR. M A SHEIKH
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 28.03.2025 (Vijay Bishnoi, CJ)
Mr. M. K. Choudhury, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant, has submitted that since the appellant, herein, as well as the respondent No. 5, herein, have retired from the respective service on attaining the age of superannuation, nothing much is required for adjudication in this writ appeal.
Mr. Rajesh Mazumdar, learned standing counsel, Education Department, as well as Mr. M. A. Sheikh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No. 5, have not disputed the fact that the appellant, herein, as well as the respondent No. 5, herein, have already retired from their respective service on attaining the age of superannuation.
In such circumstances, the instant writ appeal stands closed as dismissed.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant