261 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-38840-2025 Date of Decision:28.07.2025 Ashish @ Ashu …Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana …Respondent Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Davneet Sangwan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Dhruv Dayal, Addl. A.G. Haryana. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 483 of B.N.S.S with a prayer to grant regular bail to him in case FIR No. 35 dated 01.03.2025 registered under Sections 110, 115(2), 117(2), 126(2), 324(4), 351(3), 3(5) of B.N.S, Police Station Farakpur, District Yamuna Nagar (Annexure P-1). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely involved in the present case and was wrongly arrested on 25.03.2025. He further contends that similarly placed co-accused Sunil Kumar @ Shoki @ Kail has been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 11.07.2025 (Annexure P-2). Even, no specific role has been assigned to him in the present case. 3. On the other hand, learned State counsel has vehemently opposed the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner on the ground that serious allegations have been levelled against the present petitioner and he does not HITESH 2025.07.29 07:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh CRM-M-38840-2025 -2 deserve the concession of bail. 4. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record carefully. 5. It is not in dispute that similarly placed co-accused Sunil Kumar @ Shoki @ Kail has been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 11.07.2025 (Annexure P-2) and the case of the petitioner is at par with him. The petitioner is in custody for the last about four months and further custody of the petitioner will not serve any meaningful purpose. 6. Without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be released on bail pending trial on his furnishing bail bonds and surety to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court/ Duty Magistrate/Chief Judicial Magistrate. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 28.07.2025 JUDGE hitesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HITESH 2025.07.29 07:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh