HAFIZULLAH SHAH AND ORS. v. SHALINDER KUMAR AND ANR. (FINANCE DEPARTMENT)
CCP(S)/299/2022 · 2025-05-27
Sanjay Dhar
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8104 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8104 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 47 Regular Cause List.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CCP(S) 299/2022 in [SWP 2327/2012] CM(374/2024) CM(1697/2023) CM(6200/2022) CM(3014/2023).
HAFIZULLAH SHAH AND ORS..
…Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
VERSUS
SHALINDER KUMAR AND ANR.
Through: Mr. Bikramdeep Singh, Dy. AG for R-2.
Mr. Younis Hafeez, Assisting Counsel for R- 1,3,4 & 5.
…Respondent(s)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE.
ORDER 27.05.2025
Through the medium of the present petition, the petitioner is seeking implementation of Order dated 23.11.2016 passed by the Writ Court whereby respondents were directed to consider the claim of the petitioners for up-gradation of the pay and for promotional benefit and other reliefs. The Statement of Facts/Compliance Report stands filed on behalf of the respondents wherein the claim of the petitioners was considered in light of the judgement passed by the Writ Court and the same has been found to be devoid of any merit. In this regard, the respondents have issued the Government Order No. SE/ESTB/K/29 of 2025 dated 05.02.2025.
In view of the fact that the respondents have considered the claim of the petitioners and found it to be devoid of any merit, the order of the Writ Court
stands complied with. Therefore, the respondents cannot be proceeded against. Accordingly, the contempt proceedings are closed and the contempt petition is
disposed of.
(Sanjay Dhar)
Judge
SRINAGAR 27.05.2025 Showkat Khan