Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8104 (AP)

NARA VISWANATH v. NAGUBILLI APPALA RAJU

CRP/724/2020 · 2025-07-03

T C D Sekhar

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

'APHC010085022020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI 0l? FRIDAY THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITiriN NO: 77a nc ?non Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Civil Revision 03-02-2020 made in I.A. No. 964 of in the file of the Court of the IV Additional District Petition aggrieved by the order dated 2019 in O.S.No.359 of 2014 i Judge, Visakhapatnam Between: Nara Viswanath, S/o.Venkata Satyanarayana, Aged about 36 years, Hindu 3, Bharat Towers, 5th Lane, Dwaraka Nagar, Visakhapatnam. ...Petitioner/1** Defendant AND 1. Nagubiili Appala Raju, rep. by his GPA holder, Nagubilli Katama Rao Hindu, aged 65 years. Res/at D.No. 10-5-12, Flat No. Apartments, Kailasametta, Visakhapatnam - 530003. 2. The Visakhapatnam Cooperative Bank 302, Nilaya Ltd, Rep by Sri Ch. Ragavendra I Kotha Road, Near Reading Respondent is not Rao, Chairman, Having its office at Town Room, Visakhapatnam. (2 nd Defendant) (2 nd necessary party to this Revision) ...Respondents lA NO: 1 OF 2070 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court stay all further proceedings including trial in OS.No.359 of 2014 on file of the IV Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K SAIRAM MURTHY Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following order: may be pleased to — I APHC010085022020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 724/2020 Between: 1.NARA VISWANATH, S/O.VENKATA SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, HINDU, 3, BHARAT TOWERS, 5TH LANE, DWARAKANAGAR,VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1.NAGUBILLI APPALA RAJU, REP. BY HIS GPA HOLDER, NAGUBILLI KATAMA RAO, HINDU, AGED 65 YEARS, RES/AT D.NO. 10-5-12, FLAT NO. 302, NILAYA APARTMENTS, KAILASAMETTA, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530003. 2.THE VISAKHAPATNAM COOPERATIVE BANK LTD, REP BY SRI CH. RAGAVENDRA RAO, CHAIRMAN, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT TOWN KOTHA ROAD, NEAR READING ROOM, VISAKHAPATNAM. (2ND DEFENDANT) (2ND RESPONDENT IS NOT NECESSARY PARTY TO THIS REVISION) ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toMemorandum of Grounds of Civil Revision Petition aggrieved by the order dated 03-02-2020 made in LA. No. 964 of 2019 in O.S.No.359 of 2014 in the file of the Court of the IV Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam lA NO: 1 OF 2020 2 TCDSJ C.R.P.N0.724 0F(« Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stafea in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to stay all further proceedings including trial in OS.No.359 of 2014 on file of the IV Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 20 1.KSAIRAM MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following ORDER:- It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the present civil revision petition does not survive. 2. The said submission is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGTSTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The IV Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam. (with records if any) One CC to Sri. K Sairam Murthy, Advocate [OPUC] The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. Two CD Copies 2. 3. 4. MKP sree / HIGH COURT DATED:04/07/2025 ORDER CRP NO. 724 OF 2020 DISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS