IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL REVISION No.751 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-395 Year-2012 Thana- MUZFFARPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== MANI BHUSHAN, son of Late Yogendra Mishra, Mohalla- Gannipur Mishra Tola Ps- Kazi Mohammadpur Dist- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Parshuram Singh, son of Late Basu Singh, Village- Mahmadpur Ps- Sakra Dist- Muzaffarpur ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL REVISION No. 754 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1091 Year-2012 Thana- MUZFFARPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== MANI BHUSHAN, Son of Late Yogendra Mishra, R/o Mohalla - Gannipur Mishra Tola, P.s. - Kazi Mohammadpur, Distt. - Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Parshuram Singh, son of Late Basu Singh, R/o vill - Mahmadpur, P.S. - sakra, Distt. - Muzaffarpur ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : (In CRIMINAL REVISION No. 751 of 2023) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Suman Kumar Verma, Advocate Mr.Sunil Kumar Verma, Advocate Mr.Anish Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mrs.Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP For the O.P. No. 2 ; Mr.Ravish Mishra, Advocate Ms.Keertika Sarkar, Advocate (In CRIMINAL REVISION No. 754 of 2023) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Suman Kumar Verma, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI ORAL ORDER 5 08-07-2025 It is submitted by the learned Advocate for the petitioner that the petitioner wants to withdraw the above- Patna High Court CR. REV. No.751 of 2023(5) dt.08-07-2025 2/2 mentioned Criminal Revisions to comply with the order passed by the Court of Appeal. 2. In view of such submission, both the Criminal Revisions are dismissed as withdrawn. 3. The Appellate Court is directed to give opportunity to the petitioner to comply with the order passed in Criminal Appeal Nos. 111 of 2017 and 112 of 2017 within one month from the date of this order. 4. The Appellate Court is also directed to consider the petitioner’s prayer for suspension of sentence as an interim measure to enable him to make payment of the compensation amount. 5. On payment of such compensation amount within stipulated period, the Appellate Court is at liberty to pass an order of exemption of sentence of imprisonment in accordance with law. uttam/- (Bibek Chaudhuri, J) U